By World Bank Independent Evaluation Group
The AROE sequence keeps to reinforce its concentrate on effects, tracking, and evaluate. the most recent 2006 variation updates the results of handling for ends up in global financial institution operations, assesses if tracking and evaluate practices offer employees with details that is helping them deal with for effects, and appears at IEG's personal effectiveness. Its ideas deal with how you can make tracking and assessment greater and influential instruments.
Read or Download 2006 Annual Report on Operations Evaluation PDF
Best nonfiction_2 books
Issues In Setting Standards: Establishing Standards
The contributions during this ebook spotlight a topical universal academic subject matter - the version of outcomes-orientated criteria in schooling. The authors proportion their adventure and information at the worldwide preoccupation with quality controls versions that deal
Musculoskeletal Examination 3rd Edition
Musculoskeletal Examination is a basic textbook designed for college students, actual therapists and physicians. it really is uniquely multidisciplinary in its procedure, being written through a physiatrist, actual therapist and orthopedist. With tables and boxed beneficial properties to stress and summarize key thoughts, and 'sample exam' packing containers to spotlight and try tricky components, it truly is excellent for instructing introductory classes but distinct adequate for pro reference inside scientific perform.
- Notes on the 15 Puzzle
- Vain Rhetoric: Private Insight and Public Debate in Ecclesiastes (JSOT Supplement Series)
- Fraud Risk Checklist: A Guide for Assessing the Risk of Internal Fraud
- The 110th Congressional District Atlas
Extra resources for 2006 Annual Report on Operations Evaluation
Example text
1 It also shows the results chain for individual operations. For example, Bank funds channeled through a rural development project (input) would produce improved or new rural roads (output). This, in turn, would improve farmers’ access to markets and suppliers (intermediate outcome 1), increase profitability (intermediate outcome 2), and improve rural household incomes (final outcome). The results chain outlines how the project is expected to contribute to the overall goal of improving rural incomes and reducing poverty (the country development goal).
Bank TTLs would continue to focus on how well their project or program is progressing, but with more attention to outcomes. A recent review reached a similar conclusion. It recommended, among other measures, that the Bank organize client work into programs (clusters of tasks) focused on country or multicountry results. But incentives continue to discourage working across sectors. The review identified the current emphasis on own-unit deliverables and higher budget predictability for own-managed deliverables as key disincentives to working in multisector teams and recommended replacing the Bank’s task-based approach to budgeting and management.
If the outcomes set are too modest, country directors and TTLs may be seen as setting the bar too low. If the outcomes are The frameworks can too ambitious, they may used to establish be criticized for lacking realism, because more accountability. factors come into play in achieving the expected outcome, which makes attribution and Bank accountability unclear. Country directors and TTLs have to balance the ease of achieving successful outcomes with the risks involved in addressing important but complex issues, such as governance, or working in weaker policy and institutional environments, such as fragile states.
