By L. Sandy Maisel, Jeffrey M. Berry
The Oxford guide of yank Political events and curiosity teams is a huge new quantity that might support students determine the present country of scholarship on events and curiosity teams and the instructions within which it must movement. by no means earlier than has the educational literature on political events acquired such a longer therapy. Thirty chapters seriously examine either the main contributions to the literature and the ways that it has constructed. With contributions from lots of the best students within the box, the quantity offers a definitive aspect of reference for all these operating in and round the zone. both vital, the authors additionally establish parts of latest and engaging examine. those chapters provide a particular viewpoint, a controversy concerning the successes and screw ups of previous scholarship, and a suite of strategies approximately how destiny paintings should increase. This quantity may help set the time table for study on political events and curiosity teams for the subsequent decade.
The Oxford Handbooks of yank Politics is an eight-volume set of reference books delivering authoritative and interesting serious overviews of the country of scholarship on American politics. every one quantity specializes in a selected element of the sector. The venture is lower than the final Editorship of George C. Edwards III, and special experts of their respective fields edit every one quantity. The handbooks goal not only to document at the self-discipline, but additionally to form it as students significantly determine the present nation of scholarship on a subject matter and suggest instructions during which it must circulation. The sequence is an fundamental reference for someone operating in American politics.
General Editor for The Oxford Handbooks of yankee Politics: George C. Edwards III
Read Online or Download The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups PDF
Best political parties books
A well-known function of analyses approximately mass mobilization in Latin the US among the Nineteen Thirties and Nineteen Fifties is an emphasis on manipulation and social keep an eye on of leaders over their constituencies. This booklet addresses mass mobilization from a unique attitude by way of focusing much less at the unidirectional motion of leaders and the passivity in their fans and extra at the interactive strategy among brokers that proficient their help for reform and the articulation of a political discourse in line with notions of consent.
Intellectuals in Action: The Origins of the New Left and Radical Liberalism, 1945-1970
Taking a look at the tips that knowledgeable the protest, social events and activism of the Sixties, this article combines conventional highbrow biography with social historical past to ascertain a gaggle of intellectuals whose considering was once the most important within the formula of recent Left political thought.
From Yellow Dog Democrats to Red State Republicans: Florida and Its Politics since 1940
“A masterful examine of Florida politics. ”—Gary R. Mormino, writer of Land of light, kingdom of Dreams“In this sweeping review of recent Florida politics, Colburn demanding situations the country’s preconceived notions of the light State’s political leanings. [It] is the results of a life of watching and studying a as soon as small and rural kingdom that has reworked itself, in under fifty years, right into a political powerhouse and nationwide weathervane.
The Politics of Party Leadership: A Cross-National Perspective
Using a different information set that comes with greater than one thousand management elections from over a hundred events in 14 international locations over a virtually 50 12 months interval, this quantity offers the 1st entire, comparative exam of the way events pick out their leaders and the influence of the several judgements they make during this regard.
Extra resources for The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups
Example text
Second, they are institutions, and therefore they are appropriate for study in the style of the new institutionalism, that is, the study of the effects of institutional rules on electoral or policy outcomes through the application of rational choice, game-theoretic reasoning. Third, they are unusually endogenous institutions. In the US, for instance, they have historically been selfdefined (rather than defined through law or regulation). For example, their national organizations adopt their defining rules each time they meet, and they do so by simple majority rule, making them as subject to what Riker (1980) called “inheritability” as any major political institution can be.
To the extent that a party’s future candidates compete on the basis of the incumbent’s reputation, the incumbent has incentives to adopt more centrist policies than she sincerely prefers in order to boost the organization’s chances in future elections.
For example, if three parties are located such that at least two are tied for second (or all three are tied) in support, this is also a Nash equilibrium, because there is a “coordination problem” multiparty equilibrium, consistent with that found in the second stream of research reviewed below. There is a sort of impossibility result affecting this first stream of research. In its most general form, if voters have spatial preferences, any single party’s support is entirely vulnerable. That is, any party can expect to have essentially zero votes.
