By Richard Swedberg
Richard Swedberg (ed.)
All social scientists research the prestigious theories and frameworks in their predecessors, utilizing them to notify their very own study and observations. yet prior to there may be thought, there needs to be theorizing. Theorizing in Social Science introduces the reader to the following iteration of conception building and indicates beneficial methods for growing social theory.
What makes specific sorts of theories artistic, and the way does one cross approximately theorizing in an artistic means? The members to this landmark collection—top social scientists within the fields of sociology, economics, and management—draw on own stories and new findings to supply various solutions to those questions. a few flip to cognitive psychology and neuroscience's effect on our figuring out of human proposal, others motivate better discussion among and around the arts and sciences, whereas nonetheless others concentrate on the strategies in which commentary ends up in conceptualization. Taken jointly, although, the chapters jointly and actively inspire a shift within the position of thought in social technological know-how at the present time. beautiful to scholars and scientists throughout disciplines, this assortment will motivate cutting edge ways to generating, instructing, and studying theory.
Reviews:
"The debate approximately technique within the social sciences has nearly thoroughly bypassed dialogue of the instruments that we will be able to use to construct solid theories. This publication is massive breakthrough in correcting this omission. If we're fortunate, it's going to stimulate a brand new department of technique dedicated to the tactics that analysts can so much productively use within the context of discovery."—James Mahoney, Northwestern University
Contents:
1 From concept to Theorizing
Richard Swedberg
2 Intuitionist Theorizing
Karin Knorr Cetina
3 Analogy, situations, and Comparative Social Organization
Diane Vaughan
4 The Unsettlement of groups of Inquiry
Isaac Ariail Reed and Mayer N. Zald
5 3 Frank inquiries to self-discipline Your Theorizing
Daniel B. Klein
6 Mundane Theorizing, Bricolage, and Bildung
Stephen Turner
7 The Counterfactual mind's eye
Roland Paulsen
8 The paintings of Theorizing
Karl E. Weick
9 Susan Sontag and Heteroscedasticity
James G. March
Afterword
Neil Gross
Read Online or Download Theorizing in Social Science: The Context of Discovery PDF
Similar social theory books
David Fernbach (tr. ), Alex Callinicos (Foreword)
This quantity, initially released in French less than the identify Que faire du Capital? , bargains a brand new interpretation of Marx’s nice paintings. It indicates how the newness and lasting curiosity of Marx’s idea arises from the truth that, as opposed to the undertaking of a ‘pure’ economics, it truly is formulated in thoughts that experience concurrently an fiscal and a political point, neither of those being separable from the opposite. Jacques Bidet conducts an unheard of research of Marx’s paintings within the spirit of the historical past of technology, exploring it as a strategy of theoretical improvement. conventional exegesis reads the successive drafts of Capital as though they have been complementary and at the same time illuminated each other. in truth, like every scientist, Marx in basic terms wrote a brand new model that allows you to right the former one. He begun from rules borrowed from Ricardo and Hegel, and among one draft and the subsequent it's attainable to determine those being eradicated and restructured. This labour, in addition, used to be by no means absolutely accomplished. the writer therefore re-assesses Marx’s whole method in its set of constitutive different types: price, industry, labour-power, sessions, operating category, exploitation, creation, fetishism, ideology. He seeks to pin down the problems that those encountered, and the analytical and significant price they nonetheless have at the present time. Bidet attaches the best value to Marx’s order of exposition, which assigns every one idea its position within the total process, and makes the validity of the development depend upon the pertinence of its preliminary presuppositions. this is often rather the case with the connection among industry mechanism and capitalism – and therefore additionally among the marketplace and socialism.
The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences (Revised Edition)
Video game conception is crucial to knowing human habit and appropriate to the entire behavioral sciences—from biology and economics, to anthropology and political technological know-how. in spite of the fact that, because the Bounds of cause demonstrates, video game idea by myself can't totally clarify human habit and may as an alternative supplement different key innovations championed via the behavioral disciplines.
Regionalism and the humanities
Even supposing the framework of regionalist stories could seem to be crumbling below the load of accelerating globalization, this selection of seventeen essays makes transparent that cultivating regionalism lies on the middle of the humanist recreation. With interdisciplinary contributions from poets and fiction writers, literary historians, musicologists, and historians of structure, agriculture, and girls, this quantity implements the most leading edge and exciting methods to the historical past and cost of regionalism as a class for research within the humanities.
Postcolonial concept has loved broad impact within the humanities yet for social technological know-how, and specifically sociology, its implications stay elusive. This certain quantity brings jointly prime sociologists to discover the concept that of 'postcolonial sociology,' with fresh postcolonial readings of canonical thinkers like Karl Marx, Max Weber, Emile Durkheim and Robert Park.
Extra resources for Theorizing in Social Science: The Context of Discovery
Example text
But new techniques of brain imaging and new experimental research have revived and recast them, and they abound now in some areas under different names. Haidt (2001) provides an early review, as does Evans (2008; 2012). According to these reviewers, almost all authors agree on a distinction between processes that are unconscious, rapid, automatic, and high capacity, and those that are conscious, slow, and deliberative (Evans 2008: 256). Haidt (2001) and others distinguish between two processing systems and refer to the models as dual process models.
There may be other errors as well, which are specific to this type of theorizing. And last, the project of theorizing can truly flourish only if theorizing becomes a communal and cooperative enterprise among all kinds of social scientists, linked to each other as well as to people around the world. Peirce liked to point out that scientific inquiry is profoundly communal in nature, and that new ways of theorizing and analyzing will succeed only if they are deeply rooted in a universal community of scholars (on this see also the chapter by Reed and Zald in this book).
Diagrams may be used at several stages in the discovery process and also as a heuristic tool for explanation (Peirce 1933; Larkin and Simon 1987; Podolny 2003). Similarly, decision trees and network figures can be used to make ideas flow and help the analyst come up with explanations. In all of these cases, it deserves to be mentioned once more, what is involved is a nontraditional kind of thinking, say thinking in some form of pattern. Can material objects be used for heuristic-explanatory purposes in social science, a bit like Linus Pauling’s wooden model of a triple-strained DNA helped Francis Crick and James Watson to discover the correct molecular structure of DNA?
